The case studies lead to the following characterizations of each approach:
In the second application of SA, the design of the state space and
transitions was more suitable to the given problem, as described
in 5.1. The transition replace if overlap
achieved in reducing the local "raggedness" (discontinuity of ) of the search space, which enabled considerable improvements of
state in the lower temperatures and even in a frozen state.
As compared with SA1, the state space was extended to cover a larger total colume of the solution space, but simultaneously decreased by cutting out a large amount of intermediate states that could not contain solutions---the states with overlapping articles. With a careful selection of the state transitions, a state space with suitable connectivity and shape of the cost function was created. Compared with SA1, the frequency of good solutions was also increased. Given this it is not surprising that the results of SA2 were most promising. The approach has the advantage of being fast (as had the VIPÊ experiment), and it enables continuous continuous control of the objectives of the search via the cost function.
Despite the considerable improvement in speed of the pagination, the SA2 implementation probably would not be quick enough for pagination to take place as part of a user interface of an electronic newspaper, which is generated and viewed interactively. However, since the speed of SA2 was comparable to that of VIPÊ , also SA2 can be used in a newspaper delivered on fax or some other application without dritical efficiency requirements paginating into fixed space from large storage.
It must be emphasized that both SA1 and SA2 were implemented to solve the general layout problem of type 3 (see section 4.1.3), for building the layout with a fixed area and varying material. VIPÊ , on the other hand, was a prototype specifically designed for pagination of editorial material.