next up previous
Next: 4. Experiment 3: (A+B+C). Up: 4. Experiments Previous: 2. Experiment 1: VQ(A+B+C).

3. Experiment 2: VQ(A)+VQ(B)+VQ(C).

The sets A, B and C were each modeled with a separate VQ. For set A, 16 codebook vectors were used (cost -116397.7), for B, 19 codebook vectors (cost -3921.6) and for C, 30 codebook vectors (cost -25476.9). The total number of parameters was 1045 and the total cost was -145796.2. The model cost improved compared to Experiment 1 which shows that the general IVGA approach is feasible.


   
Table: Results of the grouping when ${\rm IVGA_{VQ}}$ was run for the combined data set A+B+C. Negative costs are due to leaving out the constant factor in Eq. 1.

Group
Variables Belong to Cost Codebook Parameters
    data set    vectors  

1
1,6 A -4760.6 7 14
2 2-5,7-8,11 A -33213.3 10 70
3 9-10,13,15-16,18-21,24-25 A -50997.9 12 132
4 12,14,17 A -14201.3 8 24
5 22,26 A -8233.6 5 10
6 23,27 A -4920.4 10 20
7 28-34 B -3889.7 20 140
8 35-38 C -6678.2 7 28
9 39-42 C -7248.3 15 60
10 43-44 C -3140.6 9 18
11 45-46 C -2708.1 13 26
12 47-50 C -7215.0 19 76
Total     -147206.8 135 618


next up previous
Next: 4. Experiment 3: (A+B+C). Up: 4. Experiments Previous: 2. Experiment 1: VQ(A+B+C).
Krista Lagus
2001-08-28