STOC 2018 · 50th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 2018

A number of recent papers – e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) – have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem $\Pi$ in which a solution can be *verified* by checking all radius-$O(1)$ neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest $T$ such that a solution can be *computed* so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-$T$ neighbourhood. Here $T$ is the distributed time complexity of $\Pi$.

The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are $\Theta(1)$, $\Theta(\log^* n)$, $\Theta(\log n)$, $\Theta(n^{1/k})$, and $\Theta(n)$. It is also known that there are two gaps: one between $\omega(1)$ and $o(\log \log^* n)$, and another between $\omega(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. It has been conjectured that many more gaps would exist, and that the overall time hierarchy would be relatively simple – indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids.

We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including $\Theta( \log^{p/q} n )$, $2^{\Theta( \log^{q/p} n )}$, and $\Theta(n^{pq/(p+q)^2})$ in the high end and $\Theta( \log^{p/q} \log^* n )$, $\smash{2^{\Theta( \log^{q/p} \log^* n )}}$, and $\Theta((\log^* n)^{q/p})$ in the low end of the complexity spectrum ($p \ge q$).